周年大選黑箱作業事件相關文獻(45)

原文連結

促請星島日報遵守專業操守守則 澄清「港大轉莊鬧憲政風波

執事先生:

貴報於今天(1/2/2013)A16版刊登由盧駿撰寫之「港大轉莊鬧違憲風波」一文，惟內容不盡不實之處甚多。
當中提到「有關程序(指香港大學學生會第九次評議會緊急會議續會中，對原選委會主席柯文俊作出免職處分，並選出徐莉嘉作為新選委會主席)昨日(1/31/2013)終於被評議會裁定為違憲及無效」。作為當晚在場、或曾觀看錄影片段之香港大學學生會基本會員，本人未見當日會議之中曾提出或通過任何相關議案，報導有誤導公眾之嫌。
現 敦請 貴報遵守報業評議會採用之《新聞從業員專業操守守則》(見備註)，盡快公開回應以下問題:
1) 作者盧駿的消息來源為何?如何確保新聞材料客觀全面?
2) 若報導真有誤導成份，會否採取措施讓當事人回應?
3) 作者盧駿會否公開澄清並道歉?
本人期望 貴報能嚴正處理以上事件。此事關乎香港大學學生會百年聲譽，以及程序公義問題。
敬候賜覆。
祝
台安

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to you to contest for the article made on page A16 of Sing Tao Daily today (1/2/2013), “港大轉莊鬧違憲風波”(HKUSU’s election dispute) to be withdrawn.

It was reported in the article “The council has deemed the resolutions of the continuation of the 9th Emergency Council Meeting (the vacation of Mr. Allen Or’s position as the Chairperson of the Union Election Committee (UEC) and the appointment of Ms. Vanessa Tsui as the new Chairperson) as invalid at the council meeting yesterday (1/2/2013)” As a full member of HKUSU, I was present at the 10th Emergency Council Meeting (ECM) with many others. I witnessed the entire meeting and did NOT witness what you reported. Therefore, I suspect that your article is deliberately misleading your readers.
I would like to urge you to obey the “Journalists’ Code of Professional Ethics” and openly reply to the following questions as soon as possible:
1) Where did Lo Jun (the author) get his source? How did he ensure that the “news” he received was the truth?
2) If the report is proven to be misleading and distorted, will there be any measures taken for the people involved to respond to it?
3) Will Lo Jun make a public apology and help clarify the truth?
I sincerely hope for Sing Tao Daily to handle this incident seriously, as this implicates the reputation of Hong Kong University Students' Union and procedural justice. I look forward to receiving your reply.

Best regards